Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Medical Record Documentation Due to Unauthorized Note Editing

Mineola, Texas Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that medical records for a resident were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards. Specifically, the Director of Nursing (DON) edited a progress note originally written by an LVN regarding wound care provided to a resident. The LVN's original note indicated that the previous dressing was dated three days prior to the wound care, suggesting a possible lapse in daily wound care. Five days after the original entry, the DON altered the note to remove the reference to the previous dressing date, despite not having performed the wound care herself. Interviews revealed that the LVN documented the date found on the dressing during the wound care and was unaware of why the DON changed her note. The DON admitted to editing the note because she perceived it as a red flag and suspected the LVN of falsifying documentation, but acknowledged that she should not have changed the note and should have addressed her concerns differently. Facility policy requires documentation to be concise, accurate, and complete, and the administrator confirmed the expectation for accurate records.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙