Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0645
E

Failure to Identify Mental Illness on PASRR Level I Screenings

San Antonio, Texas Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately identify and document mental illness diagnoses on the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessments for three residents. Specifically, two residents with major depressive disorder and one resident with schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder were not recognized as having a mental illness on their PASRR Level I screenings, despite clear documentation of these diagnoses in their medical records, medication orders, and care plans. The PASRR Level I forms for all three residents indicated 'No' in response to the question regarding evidence of mental illness, which was inconsistent with other clinical documentation. Record reviews showed that each resident had a documented diagnosis of a qualifying mental illness and was receiving psychotropic medications for these conditions. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and care plans for these residents also reflected their psychiatric diagnoses and related interventions. However, the PASRR Level I screenings did not reflect this information, resulting in a lack of appropriate identification for further evaluation or services as required by PASRR regulations. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of understanding regarding the correct completion of PASRR Level I screenings, particularly in cases where residents had documented mental illness diagnoses. The MDS nurse and DON both indicated that hospital PASRR assessments were often submitted without updates to reflect current diagnoses, and that negative PASRR Level I results were routinely accepted even when residents were on psychotropic medications for mental illness. The facility's policy required coordination with local authorities for further evaluation when a PASRR Level I indicated possible mental illness, but this process was not followed due to the inaccurate screenings.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙