Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Update Clinical Records After Hospice Discharge

Pleasanton, Texas Survey Completed on 04-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records for a resident who was discharged from hospice services. Despite the resident's discharge from hospice, the medical record, including physician orders and the care plan, continued to reflect active hospice services. This included orders to call hospice for certain conditions and documentation indicating the resident was still under hospice care, even after official discharge notices and cancellation forms were present in the record. The resident in question had multiple complex medical diagnoses, including atherosclerotic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic venous hypertension with ulcer, chronic kidney disease, and hemiplegia. The resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had a history of behavioral symptoms and incontinence. Interviews with staff, including LVNs, CNAs, the DON, and the MDS Coordinator, confirmed that the resident was no longer receiving hospice services, and that the clinical record should have been updated to reflect this change. However, the orders and care plan remained unchanged, inaccurately indicating ongoing hospice involvement. Staff interviews revealed that responsibility for updating the clinical record was shared among nursing staff, with the MDS Coordinator and nurse managers having access to make necessary changes. The DON and Administrator acknowledged that the inaccuracy in the clinical record could lead to errors in care and treatment, as staff might follow outdated orders. The facility's policy required maintaining complete and accurate electronic clinical records, but this was not followed in this instance, resulting in the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙