Failure to Timely Report and Investigate Alleged Sexual Abuse
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. Specifically, a male resident with vascular dementia, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and moderate cognitive impairment reported to staff that a certified nursing assistant (CNA) had sexually abused him during a shower. The resident initially delayed reporting the incident due to embarrassment, but later informed staff members, who did not immediately escalate the allegation to the facility administrator or law enforcement as required by policy and regulation. Multiple staff interviews revealed that the resident's report of sexual abuse was communicated among staff, including a medication aide, charge nurse, and assistant director of nursing (ADON), but there was confusion and lack of clarity regarding who was responsible for notifying the administrator and external authorities. The ADON stated that he informed the administrator by phone, but the administrator denied receiving any such report or having knowledge of the allegation. Documentation review showed no record of the abuse allegation in the resident's progress notes, 24-hour reports, or self-reports to the state survey agency during the relevant period. The CNA accused of abuse continued to work in the facility and was not suspended until months after the initial allegation. The facility's abuse/neglect policy required immediate reporting of all allegations to the administrator and appropriate authorities, but this protocol was not followed. Staff interviews indicated inconsistent understanding and execution of reporting procedures, with some staff assuming others had reported the incident. The lack of timely and proper reporting resulted in a failure to protect residents from potential further harm and did not meet regulatory requirements for abuse allegation management.
Removal Plan
- Abuse allegation investigations are ongoing. All new investigations start immediately upon receiving an allegation.
- The resident was interviewed at the time of discovery and a trauma informed care assessment was completed by the DON. Results were no negative outcomes.
- One on One in-service on Abuse Reporting with the Administrator, DON, by Area Director of Operation (ADO).
- One on One in-service on Investigating allegations with the Administrator, DON, by ADO.
- Staff working with alleged perpetrators have been interviewed by the Administrator, Director of Nursing, ADO, and Compliance Nurse.
- The alleged perpetrator was suspended, pending the outcome of the investigation.
- The ADON was suspended, pending the outcome of the investigation.
- Notification of Authorities: Law enforcement and HHSC were notified promptly in accordance with state-mandated reporting guidelines.
- Emotional Support: Social services and/or a mental health provider were contacted to provide counseling and emotional support to the resident; referral was sent.
- All residents who were able to be interviewed had safety surveys by the social worker. No abuse incidents were reported.
- All residents who were able to be interviewed were interviewed by DON/Compliance Nurse/Social worker. A new skin assessment was completed on all non-verbal residents by the same group with no abnormal findings.
- The following in-services were initiated by the Administrator/ADO: Any staff member not present or in-service will not be allowed to assume their duties until in-service.
- All Staff in-serviced on: Abuse/Neglect with special focus on sexual abuse; Abuse/Neglect Reporting; Who to Report Abuse/Neglect to Administrator and Director of Nursing. A second layer of reporting was added to prevent oversight of a single individual.
- All in-serviced staff will need to be able to articulate back on reporting any abuse allegation and to whom to report.
- The administrator/designee will assess and monitor understanding by quizzing and providing examples on in-services.
- New staff will be in service during orientation before assuming any duties.
- The medical director was notified of the immediate jeopardy situation.
- The administrator will report any abuse allegations, investigate, and submit findings to the Area Director and Risk Management for review.
- The administrator will submit documentation of the investigation with Resident and Staff interviews, as well as weekly follow-up interviews with staff and residents to ensure resident safety/satisfaction with the outcome of the investigation.
- The Area Director will monitor abuse allegations reported by residents and or staff and check the real-time system, which monitors keywords like abuse documentation and PCC for any incidents and accidents.
- The QA committee will review the findings of abuse allegations and investigations monthly and make changes to the system as needed until substantial compliance is achieved.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
A cognitively intact resident with a history of vertebral compression fracture, repeated falls, and bipolar disorder alleged that an RN hurt his back while assisting him to sit up during a medication pass, becoming combative and stating he was injured. Witnesses confirmed the interaction and noted the resident’s agitation and dislike of the nurse. The DON acknowledged the resident’s ongoing issues with certain nursing staff, and the Ombudsman reported notifying the Administrator that the resident had alleged physical abuse by staff. Despite this, the Administrator did not submit a required self-reported incident to the State agency, contrary to facility policy mandating timely reporting of all abuse allegations.
The facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the state agency as required by its abuse policy. A resident with multiple chronic conditions and intact cognition had elected video monitoring in the room. Video review showed an LPN shouting at the resident and using foul language, and a family member later submitted a written concern about the LPN’s behavior. The conduct was documented as disrespectful, abusive, and unprofessional, and the IDON confirmed it met criteria for a self-reportable incident. The HR director identified the affected resident, but the Administrator acknowledged that the incident was never reported to the state agency, contrary to the facility’s requirement to report abuse allegations within specified timeframes.
The facility failed to self-report multiple resident-to-resident physical altercations as allegations of abuse to the State Agency, despite having internal documentation and an abuse policy requiring such reporting. In several separate events, cognitively impaired residents with known histories of aggressive behaviors hit or punched other cognitively impaired residents in the abdomen, head, face, or chest. Nursing staff and CNAs documented the incidents, assessed the involved residents, and noted that no visible injuries were present, although one resident reported pain. The Administrator, DON, and other clinical leadership acknowledged that internal investigations were completed but stated that no Self-Reported Incidents were submitted because they believed there was no injury and that the residents lacked intent to harm or cause mental anguish, contrary to the facility’s written abuse policy and abuse flow sheet, which defined physical abuse to include hitting and required timely reporting of alleged violations involving abuse.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple comorbidities, who depended on staff for most care, was found by a family member to have a light purple bruise on the right cheek while being assisted with lunch. The RN on duty had not previously noticed the discoloration and notified the DON, who suggested it might have resulted from contact with a bedrail during incontinence care, though staff interviews did not confirm any such contact. The incident report lacked a clear description of the event, no skin assessment or medical record entry was completed for that day, the bruise was not logged on the incident/accident log, and no self-reported incident was submitted to the State Survey Agency, despite facility policy requiring timely reporting of suspected abuse or injuries of unknown origin.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple comorbidities alleged that a male CNA attempted to force sexual contact during personal care, identifying him by name and description. A social worker designee and the HR director interviewed the resident, confirmed the description matched a CNA on duty, and notified the Administrator by phone, but the incident was not documented in the medical record and was not promptly reported to the state as a sexual abuse allegation per facility policy. The internal investigation for that day lacked detailed witness statements from key staff and concluded no abuse occurred, relying in part on the resident’s son’s belief that no investigation was needed. When an SRI was later submitted, it was entered as physical abuse rather than sexual abuse, and a subsequent police report reflected conflicting information about when the facility became aware of the allegation.
A cognitively intact resident with multiple psychiatric and medical diagnoses reported to a provider that an LPN became angry, yelled, and used profanity toward them. This allegation of verbal abuse was documented in the medical record but was not entered into the facility’s SRI system, and the Administrator was not informed, so no timely reporting or investigation occurred as required by the facility’s abuse policy and federal timeframes.
Failure to Report Resident’s Allegation of Staff Abuse to State Agency
Penalty
Summary
Failure to timely report a resident’s allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to the State agency occurred after a cognitively intact resident with a history of wedge compression fracture of the T7-T8 vertebra, repeated falls, and bipolar disorder alleged that a nurse hurt his back while assisting him to sit up in bed. On the morning in question, a CPT RN entered the resident’s room to administer medications and, according to witness statements, the resident asked for help to sit up. The nurse assisted by holding the resident’s wrists/hands while he moved to a sitting position. Witness statements documented that the resident became combative, abusive, and agitated during the interaction, and that he did not like the nurse or new staff. The nurse later reported that the resident stated she had hurt him, which she denied. The DON reported that the resident had problems with Nigerian nursing staff and specifically with the CPT RN involved. The Administrator stated that the resident did not report abuse, but rather that the nurse pulled his hands to help him up and he felt it hurt his back, and confirmed that no Self-Reported Incident (SRI) was filed with the State agency. An Ombudsman reported calling the Administrator and relaying that the resident had alleged physical abuse by nursing staff, yet an SRI was still not submitted. This inaction occurred despite the facility’s abuse, neglect, and misappropriation policy requiring that alleged violations involving abuse be reported to the State Survey Agency and other authorities within specified time frames.
Failure to Report Verbal Abuse Allegation to State Agency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the state agency as required by its abuse, neglect and exploitation policy. Resident #65, who had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, obesity, tremor, need for assistance with personal care, and Parkinsonism, was admitted on 07/23/25 and discharged on 03/02/26, with a quarterly MDS dated 01/28/26 indicating intact cognition. The resident’s care plan, initiated 07/29/25 and revised 08/12/25, documented that the resident elected to have video monitoring in his room. Review of the resident’s progress notes from 12/01/25 through 12/22/25 showed no documentation of verbal abuse by staff. Review of LPN #221’s personnel file on 03/26/26 revealed a Corrective Action Report (CAR) signed 01/01/26 for incidents on 12/01/25 and 12/22/25, citing violations of rules of conduct and behavior. The CAR documented that on 12/01/25, LPN #221 was observed on video shouting at the resident and using foul or cursing language, and that on 12/22/25 a family member submitted a written concern regarding the LPN’s behavior toward them. The CAR described this behavior as disrespectful, abusive, and unprofessional. The Interim DON confirmed that the described behavior met criteria for a self-reportable incident. The Human Resources Director confirmed that Resident #65 was the resident involved. The Administrator later confirmed that the incident was not reported to the state agency, despite the facility’s policy requiring immediate reporting, but no later than two hours after an allegation of abuse is made. This deficiency was identified incidentally during a complaint survey completed on 03/26/26.
Failure to Self-Report Resident-to-Resident Physical Altercations as Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to timely self-report multiple resident-to-resident physical altercations to the State Agency (SA) as allegations of abuse, in accordance with federal requirements and the facility’s own Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy. For one incident, a resident with Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with mood disturbance, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, and obesity, who had a documented history of verbal and physical aggression, pushed and struck another cognitively impaired resident in the abdomen after the second resident slammed a dining room chair into a table and attempted to push the first resident’s wheelchair. The second resident then struck the first resident on the back of the head. Nursing notes and internal incident reports documented the altercation, assessments, and that no injuries were observed. The Administrator and DON acknowledged that an internal investigation was conducted but confirmed that no Self-Reported Incident (SRI) was filed because there was no injury and they believed the residents lacked the ability to intend harm or cause mental anguish, despite the facility’s abuse flow sheet indicating that the reasonable person concept should be applied to such physical altercations. In a separate incident involving the same aggressive resident, staff responded to another resident’s room after hearing a verbal outburst. They found the cognitively impaired resident who had a history of aggressive behaviors sitting on the other resident’s bed, while the room’s occupant, who had Alzheimer’s disease with late onset, psychosis, vascular dementia, and other psychiatric and behavioral diagnoses, was in a wheelchair eating dinner. The room’s occupant reported that the aggressive resident had come into his room, gotten onto his bed, and punched him in the face. Nursing documentation and an internal risk report confirmed that the residents were separated and that no injuries were observed. The Administrator and DON again stated that an internal investigation was completed but that no SRI was submitted to the SA because there was no injury and they believed the residents involved did not have the ability to intend harm or cause mental anguish, even though the facility’s policy and abuse flow sheet defined physical abuse to include hitting and required reporting of alleged violations within specified timeframes. Another incident involved a resident with dementia and extensive behavioral symptoms, including exit seeking, physical aggression toward staff, verbal aggression, wandering into other residents’ rooms, and other disruptive behaviors, striking a severely cognitively impaired resident with multiple medical conditions, including vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, and chronic kidney disease. According to the Incident Audit Report and a Physical Aggression Form, a CNA witnessed the aggressive resident hit the other resident in the left side of the chest with her hand in a common area and immediately redirected the aggressor. The nurse assessed the struck resident, documented no redness or bruising, and recorded vital signs within normal limits, though the resident stated that it hurt and did not know why she had been hit. The physician and family were notified, and monitoring for pain or bruising was ordered. The DON stated that no SRI was completed because she did not believe the resident sustained an injury requiring reporting, despite the facility’s Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy defining physical abuse as including hitting and requiring immediate reporting of alleged violations involving abuse to the SA within the required timeframe. Across these events, record review, interviews, and policy review showed that the facility consistently treated these resident-to-resident physical altercations as internal incidents without reporting them as allegations of abuse to the SA. The facility’s abuse policy and undated abuse flow sheet specified that physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking, and that alleged violations involving abuse must be reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, when the events involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. The abuse flow sheet also clarified that having a mental disorder or cognitive impairment does not automatically preclude a resident from engaging in deliberate or non-accidental actions and directed staff to use the reasonable person concept to determine psychosocial impact. Despite this, the Administrator, DON, and RN/VPOC acknowledged that SRIs were not filed for these incidents because they focused on the absence of observed injury and their belief that the residents lacked intent, rather than on the willful nature of the physical acts and the reasonable potential for injury or mental anguish as required by their own policy.
Failure to Report and Document Injury of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to report an allegation of an injury of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency as required by policy and regulation. A resident with Alzheimer’s disease, severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 00), protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, and chronic kidney disease was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living and required monitoring for skin concerns during care. On the date in question, the resident’s family member observed a light purple bruise or discoloration on the resident’s right cheek while staff were assisting with lunch and reported it to an RN, who had not previously noticed the area and then notified the DON. The DON assessed the area and suggested it could have been caused by the resident’s cheek resting on a side rail during incontinence care, but staff interviews revealed no evidence that the resident’s face had come into contact with the bed rail. Despite the family’s report and the DON’s stated intent to investigate, the incident was not fully documented or reported as required. The facility’s incident report did not specify the nature of the incident, and there was no skin assessment documented in the medical record on the date the bruise was identified. The bruise was not entered on the February incident/accident log, and review of the state’s Enhanced Information Dissemination Collection system showed no self-reported incident related to the resident’s facial discoloration for the relevant period. The DON confirmed that no self-reported incident was submitted regarding this injury of unknown origin, contrary to the facility’s abuse policy, which requires notification of the Ohio Department of Health within 24 hours and completion of an investigation within five days.
Failure to Timely Report and Properly Classify Allegation of Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to timely report an allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse to the state agency as required by policy. A resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, depression, and multiple medical conditions, who required extensive assistance of two staff for mobility and transfers, alleged that a male CNA attempted to put his genitalia in her mouth. The resident identified the alleged perpetrator by name and physical description, which matched a male CNA on duty. The social worker designee and the human resources director interviewed the resident the same morning, confirmed the description, and contacted the Administrator by phone while in the resident’s room, placing the Administrator on speaker so she could hear the interview and reported events. Despite the Administrator being made aware of the allegation on the same morning it occurred, the facility did not document the incident in the resident’s medical record and did not report the allegation of sexual abuse to the state agency at that time. The internal investigation file for that date contained only brief, non-witness statements from staff attesting generally to the CNA’s behavior, with no detailed statements from the social worker designee, the human resources director, the LPN caring for the resident, or the CNA accused. The investigation summary concluded that the resident was confused and combative during personal care and that no abuse occurred, and the facility relied in part on the resident’s son’s opinion that an investigation was not needed and that the resident might have a urinary tract infection. Subsequently, when an SRI was entered into the state’s reporting system, it was categorized as physical abuse rather than sexual abuse, and there was no SRI entered for the original date of the allegation. A police report later documented that the Administrator reported the incident as sexual in nature and stated that the facility was not made aware of the allegation until the resident’s son reported concerns, which conflicted with staff interviews confirming the Administrator’s awareness on the date of the incident. The facility’s own abuse policy required that any allegation or suspicion of all types of abuse be reported to the state agency prior to investigation, but the allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse was not reported as such when initially known, and the investigation was incomplete and poorly documented.
Plan Of Correction
This plan of correction does not constitute an admission to any of the allegations contained within the State of Deficiency. Rather, this plan of corrections has been prepared and executed because state and federal law require it, and not because Park Health Center agrees with the citation. The facility maintains that the alleged deficiency does not individually or collectively jeopardize the health and safety of the residents. This plan of correction is not meant to establish any standard of care contract, obligation or position, and Park Health Center reserves all rights to raise all possible contentions and defenses in any civil or criminal claim, action or proceeding. This plan of correction shall also operate as the facilities credible allegation of compliance. Please accept 4/10/2026 as our date of compliance. The facility will continue to report and investigate allegations of abuse thoroughly ensuring the safety and wellbeing of their residents. Resident #171 continues to reside at the facility and seen by CNP on 3/12/26 with no noted injuries or negative effects. Psych nurse practitioner assessed residents #171 on 3/19/26 with no changes noted to psychosocial wellbeing. Resident #171 denied any complaints and appeared calm and relaxed stating to the NP that she feels safe. CNA # 340, was suspended on 3/12/26 pending investigation. The Police department was called on 3/12/26 and reported to the facility. A thorough investigation completed and submitted on 3/19/26. Conclusion of abuse investigation noted no evidence that abuse occurred. HRD conducted new background check on CNA #340 on 3/26/26, no negative findings noted. Resident #171 care plan was reviewed by the IDT on 4/8/26. The regional Clinician conducted an Audit of last 3 months of incidents and progress notes ensuring allegations of abuse were reported timely and thoroughly investigated. Initial audit was completed on 4/6/26. No negative findings noted. On 4/6/26, the Administrator, Nurse Management team, SSD and HRD were reeducated on the facility policies and procedures for reporting allegations timely, conducting a thorough and factual investigation and ensuring perpetrators are removed from the facility for resident's safety to prevent further abuse. Reeducation was conducted by the Regional Clinician. A QA committee meeting was held on 4/8/26 reviewing survey results and findings, investigation and medical record documentation requirements, policy and procedures for abuse prevention and reporting abuse, SS policy and procedure, and facilities change in condition policy and procedure. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, audits will be conducted by the regional clinician ensuring abuse allegations are investigated thoroughly, factually documented and reported, and ensuring identified perpetrators are removed from the facility as indicated. Negative findings will be corrected immediately by reporting allegation and conducting a thorough investigation and providing reeducation. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Regional Administrator will ensure the completion of the weekly audits. The Administrator is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Timely Report Allegation of Verbal Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to timely report an allegation of verbal abuse and initiate an investigation in accordance with its abuse reporting policy and federal requirements. Resident #23, admitted on 02/02/26 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder (current episode manic without psychotic features, moderate), anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism, mixed hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder (single episode, severe, without psychotic features), and hypertension, was documented as cognitively intact on the admission MDS. The MDS also showed the resident required supervision for toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers, setup assistance for oral and personal hygiene, and was independent with eating and bed mobility. On 02/16/26, a provider visit note signed by Former Nurse Practitioner #175 documented that Resident #23 reported an incident in which a staff member, identified as LPN #94, became angry, yelled, and used profanity toward the resident. Review of the facility’s electronic Self-Reported Incidents (SRI) system from 02/16/26 to 03/11/26 showed no alleged incidents involving this resident had been entered. During an interview on 03/11/26, the Administrator stated she had not been informed of any abuse allegation involving LPN #94 and Resident #23 and indicated she would have reported and investigated the allegation if she had been made aware. Review of the facility’s Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program policy, revised 04/2021, showed the facility was required to investigate and report any allegations within federally required timeframes; this did not occur for the allegation involving Resident #23.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release May 27, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
