Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
E

Failure to Secure Second-Floor Windows with Tamper-Proof Limiters

Menlo Park, California Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to ensure that second-floor windows were properly secured to prevent them from opening more than 4 inches, as required to protect confused residents from the risk of jumping out. During an observation with the Administrator, windows in several rooms on the second floor were found without any devices to limit their opening, allowing them to be opened to at least 30 inches. The Administrator confirmed that mechanical limiters should have been in place but were missing. Further interviews revealed that the window limiting devices used were thumb screws, which could be easily removed by staff, residents, or visitors. The Assistant Maintenance Worker (AMW) stated that he checked the windows weekly but did not document these checks, and admitted that he did not measure how wide the windows could be opened during his audits. An audit conducted by the facility found that out of 80 windows, only specific rooms lacked limiters and could be fully opened. Additionally, there was no facility policy regarding the securing and inspection of windows. Further inspection showed that some windows with limiters could still be opened wider than the intended 3 inches, and in one case, a wood screw was used as an improvised limiter, allowing the window to open to 10.25 inches. These findings were confirmed through observation and interviews with facility staff.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙