Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0694
D

Failure to Assess and Remove Unnecessary IV Catheter

Northridge, California Survey Completed on 05-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide care and services that meet professional standards of quality by not assessing the continued need for a peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter for a resident who was admitted after spinal fusion surgery. Upon admission, the resident had an IV in place on the back side of her right lower arm, but there was no physician order or indication for IV fluids or medications. The resident expressed that she did not know why the IV had not been removed and found it annoying, though it was not painful. The admission and skin evaluation records did not document the presence of an IV, and the electronic medical record also lacked any order or indication for its use. Nursing staff, including a registered nurse and the Director of Nursing, confirmed that the IV should have been identified and removed upon admission, as there was no ongoing need for it. The facility's policy required physician orders for initiating IV therapy, specifying details such as dose, frequency, duration, and diagnosis, none of which were present for this resident. The failure to remove the unnecessary IV upon admission constituted a lapse in following professional standards and facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙