Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0645
D

Failure to Obtain and Document PASARR Level II Evaluations

Santa Monica, California Survey Completed on 05-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a Pre-Admission Screening Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation was obtained and maintained in the charts for two residents who screened positive for mental disorders or intellectual disabilities. For both residents, documentation showed that they had diagnoses such as anxiety, dementia, and depressive disorder, and were dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Their PASARR Level I screenings indicated the need for a Level II evaluation, but there was no evidence in the records that the required follow-up with the PASARR Level II office occurred, nor was there documentation of any contact or response from the PASARR office. Interviews with the MDS nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility's process requires follow-up with the PASARR Level II office if no response is received within three days. However, in both cases, the facility did not document any follow-up actions or communications. The facility's policy states that staff should coordinate recommendations from the PASARR Level II determination with resident assessments and care planning, but this was not done for the two residents identified in the report.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙