Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Ensure Resident Rights to Communication, Decision-Making, and Accurate Documentation

Bell Gardens, California Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to complete and timely submit referrals for probate conservatorship for two residents who lacked decision-making capacity and had no responsible party or conservator. Both residents had severe cognitive impairments and were unable to make informed medical decisions, yet their records incorrectly listed them as self-responsible. The Social Services Director (SSD) did not initiate the conservatorship process because the Admission Records were not updated to reflect the residents' incapacity, resulting in a lack of oversight for their medical care and improper notification of changes, including during hospital transfers. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected residents' language preferences and need for interpreter services. For two residents, the MDS incorrectly indicated that they did not require an interpreter, despite their limited English proficiency and preference for communication in their native languages. Staff made assumptions about language preferences without verifying with the residents or their families, leading to communication barriers. Staff were also unaware of available interpreter services and had not received training on their use, further impeding effective communication. The facility also failed to provide a communication board for a non-verbal resident with aphasia, despite documentation in the care plan indicating the need for alternative communication tools. The resident was unable to express needs or participate in care planning due to the absence of a communication device. Staff acknowledged the lack of a communication board and recognized that the resident could not receive appropriate assistance without it. Facility policies required the provision of communication aids and staff training, but these were not implemented as needed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙