Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During High-Contact Care

Vista, California Survey Completed on 05-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) for a resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer and an indwelling urinary catheter. According to facility policy, EBPs require staff to use gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities for residents with certain conditions, including wounds and catheters. Observations revealed that a certified nursing assistant (CNA) emptied the resident's urinary catheter bag while wearing gloves but did not don a gown, contrary to policy requirements. The CNA stated she was not required to wear a gown for catheter care. Additionally, a licensed vocational nurse (LVN) provided wound care to the same resident without wearing a gown and acknowledged this omission during an interview. Interviews with the infection preventionist, director of nursing, and executive director confirmed that EBPs, including the use of gowns and gloves, were expected for residents with catheters, wounds, or gastrostomy tubes. The resident involved had a medical history of type 2 diabetes, a stage 4 pressure ulcer, and obstructive and reflux uropathy, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Despite clear facility policy and leadership expectations, staff did not consistently follow EBP protocols during high-contact care activities for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙