Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Gender Preference for Care Providers

Vista, California Survey Completed on 05-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's preference for care to be provided only by female CNAs, despite this preference being documented in the resident's care plan and discussed in care conferences. The resident, who had diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis, and was cognitively intact, expressed discomfort and distress when a male CNA assisted with her care. On at least two occasions, a male CNA was involved in providing personal care, even though the resident and her family had repeatedly communicated her preference for female caregivers to facility staff. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident's preference was known, but staff proceeded with care involving a male CNA due to perceived staffing limitations or urgency, despite several female CNAs being scheduled during the relevant shifts. The facility's own policies and the resident's care plan emphasized the importance of respecting resident preferences and rights, but these were not followed in practice, resulting in the resident experiencing psychological discomfort.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙