Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Improper Use of Four Bed Side Rails

Covina, California Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident was observed in bed with all four side rails raised, contrary to the facility's policy and the resident's physician order, which allowed for a maximum of three side rails. The resident, who had a history of respiratory failure with hypoxia and congestive heart failure, required maximal assistance for activities of daily living but had intact cognition. During the observation, a CNA confirmed that only three side rails should have been raised and acknowledged that having all four up could make the resident feel trapped. Further review of the resident's records, including the Admission Record, History and Physical, Minimum Data Set, physician's orders, and the Side Rails Assessment, consistently indicated that no more than three side rails were to be used. The facility's policy also specified a three-rail maximum except under specific circumstances, which did not apply in this case. Staff interviews corroborated that the use of all four side rails was not appropriate and could be considered a restraint.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙