Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0804
E

Failure to Provide Palatable and Appropriately Served Food

La Jolla, California Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors found that the facility failed to ensure food and drink were palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature for fifteen of fifty-one sampled residents. Multiple residents reported receiving food that was cold, bland, unappetizing, or not as described on the menu. Specific complaints included cold sausage with brussels sprouts, dry and hard scrambled eggs, canned vegetables, tough chicken, and repeated servings of disliked items such as carrots. Some residents also noted that food was unidentifiable, lacked flavor, or appeared to be leftovers from previous days. Additionally, there were reports of residents not receiving requested items, such as sandwiches for dialysis appointments, and issues with food allergies not being accommodated. During a Resident Council Meeting, several residents echoed these concerns, citing rubbery pancakes, repeated meals, and difficulty accessing or reading the posted menu. Observations of the tray line and test trays confirmed that food temperatures were within facility standards but the food was consistently described as bland and in need of seasoning. The Registered Dietician acknowledged the importance of assessing and documenting residents' food preferences and dislikes, as well as providing alternatives, but the facility's practices did not align with these expectations. The facility's policy stated that residents' food preferences would be adhered to within reason, with substitutes and condiments available unless contraindicated, but these standards were not consistently met.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙