Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Honor Resident Preferences for Meals and Dietary Choices

La Jolla, California Survey Completed on 05-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor the rights of two residents regarding their preferences and choices in care. One resident, who had hemiplegia and hemiparesis due to cerebrovascular disease, expressed a dislike for eggs but was served an omelette for breakfast despite her meal ticket clearly indicating eggs as a disliked item. Staff interviews confirmed that meal trays were supposed to be checked for resident preferences by both dietary and nursing staff, but this process failed to prevent the resident from receiving food she did not want. Facility policy and admission documents also stated that resident preferences should be accommodated, but this was not followed in practice. Another resident, diagnosed with protein-calorie malnutrition, attended dialysis appointments three times a week and requested a sandwich, Nepro supplement, and napkins for these visits. Despite making this request to multiple staff members, including the dietician, the resident continued to receive only three cups of puree food and Nepro, which he discarded. The dietician acknowledged the request but did not document it or discuss it with the interdisciplinary team, and the resident's dietary preference was not accommodated. The facility's own documents indicated that residents have the right to reasonable accommodation of their needs and preferences, but this was not upheld in these cases.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙