Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0697
D

Failure to Provide Safe and Appropriate Pain Management

Modesto, California Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident with multiple serious diagnoses, including malignant neoplasm of the prostate, hemiplegia, and secondary malignant neoplasm of bone. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment, was observed exhibiting nonverbal signs of pain such as grimacing, wincing, and moaning while repositioning in bed. Despite a physician's order for Norco to be administered for moderate pain (pain level 4-6), the resident was not given the medication when his pain was recorded at a level 4. This was confirmed by a licensed nurse, who acknowledged that the medication was not administered as ordered for the documented pain level. Additionally, the resident's pain scores were frequently recorded at 7 or higher over several days, but there was no pain management regimen in place for severe pain (pain level 7-10). Nursing staff did not contact the resident's physician to review or adjust the pain medication orders despite repeated high pain scores. There was also no documentation of any communication with the physician regarding the need for a change in the pain management plan. Facility policy required systematic recognition, assessment, treatment, and monitoring of pain, including collaboration with the physician to develop and revise interventions as necessary. The policy also specified that staff should notify the practitioner if pain was not controlled by the current regimen. These procedures were not followed, resulting in the resident not receiving appropriate pain relief as required by both physician orders and facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙