Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
E

Failure to Implement and Document Repositioning Interventions for At-Risk Residents

Stockton, California Survey Completed on 04-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement and document the required repositioning interventions for four residents who were assessed as being at risk for pressure ulcer development. Each of these residents had significant mobility impairments, such as hemiplegia, anoxic brain damage, paraplegia, or other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and were dependent on staff for turning and repositioning in bed. Their care plans specifically included interventions for turning and repositioning every two hours and as needed, in accordance with facility policy and recognized standards of practice. Observations and interviews with staff confirmed that these residents were unable to reposition themselves and relied entirely on staff for this care. However, a review of the electronic health records and point of care documentation for a specific date revealed significant gaps in the documentation of turning and repositioning. For each of the four residents, the documented times for repositioning did not meet the care plan requirement of every two hours, with long intervals between recorded repositioning events. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the documentation did not show that the residents were turned and repositioned as frequently as required by their care plans. The facility's own policies require that residents who are bed-bound and dependent on staff be repositioned at least every two hours, and that care plans be implemented as written to address identified risks. The lack of documented evidence that these interventions were carried out as planned constituted a failure to implement the care plans and facility policy, potentially exposing the residents to the risk of pressure ulcer development.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙