Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Ensure Wanderguard Use for Resident with Wandering Risk

Grass Valley, California Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with dementia and a history of wandering and exit-seeking behavior was not wearing a wanderguard bracelet as ordered. The resident's medical record included a physician's order for a wanderguard to be worn on the right ankle, with nursing staff required to check its placement every shift. Despite this, during an observation, the resident was seen without the wanderguard, even though the Medication Administration Record for that shift had been signed off by the nurse as if the device was in place. Staff present at the time confirmed the absence of the wanderguard and speculated that the resident may have removed it. The facility's policies on wandering and elopement, as well as on assistive devices, require identification of at-risk residents and the provision of safety interventions such as wanderguards. The Director of Nursing confirmed in an interview that the resident should always have the wanderguard on as ordered. The failure to ensure the resident was wearing the wanderguard as prescribed constituted a lapse in following safety protocols for residents at risk of wandering.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙