Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0636
D

Inaccurate Coding of RAI-MDS Assessments for Two Residents

Victorville, California Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) for two residents, resulting in assessments that did not reflect their current medical status. For one resident, the RAI-MDS assessment did not indicate a diagnosis of schizophrenia, despite the admission record listing schizophrenia among the resident's diagnoses. Both the Assistant Director of Nursing and the MDS Nurse confirmed during interviews that the omission was an oversight and that the assessment should have included the schizophrenia diagnosis, as required by the RAI manual. For another resident, the RAI-MDS assessment failed to document the presence of a stage 1 pressure ulcer that was identified upon admission. The admission assessment and physician's orders confirmed the existence of the pressure ulcer, and the Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that the assessment was incorrectly coded. The RAI manual specifies that skin conditions, including pressure ulcers, must be accurately documented to ensure a complete assessment. These failures resulted in the MDS assessments not accurately reflecting the residents' current health conditions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙