Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Honor Resident Snack Preferences and Choice

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's right to make choices regarding snack preferences. A resident with diagnoses including obesity, chronic pulmonary edema, type 2 diabetes, and hemiplegia, who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for activities of daily living, was subject to a physician order that restricted snacks to only healthy options and instructed staff to tell the resident that snacks had run out if he requested more. The resident reported feeling frustrated when told that snacks were unavailable, despite his desire for more and enjoyment of snacks such as ice cream. Staff interviews and record reviews revealed that the facility had not actually run out of snacks, and a Licensed Vocational Nurse acknowledged that the physician order was inappropriate and that residents should be provided snacks when requested. Facility policies reviewed indicated that residents have the right to exercise choice and dignity, including decisions about food and daily activities. The practice of misleading the resident about snack availability directly limited his ability to make choices about his food preferences.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙