Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop Individualized, Measurable Care Plan After Change in Condition

Pico Rivera, California Survey Completed on 05-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for a resident following a change in condition, specifically after the resident exhibited behaviors such as kneeling and placing themselves on the floor, despite being identified as a high fall risk. The resident had a history of severe cognitive impairment, dependence on staff for activities of daily living, and diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, a right ulna fracture, and unsteadiness on their feet. The care plan in place noted the resident's risk for falls and listed general interventions such as anticipating and meeting needs, but did not specify the type or frequency of supervision or monitoring required. Further review revealed that after the resident began placing themselves on the floor, the care plan was updated to include frequent visual monitoring and placement near the nursing station for closer supervision. However, the care plan did not define how often this monitoring should occur. Staff interviews confirmed that 1:1 monitoring was implemented and that the resident was kept near the nurse's station, but the care plan lacked measurable, specific timetables for these interventions. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the care plan should have included more specific monitoring intervals, especially given the resident's behaviors.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙