Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
D

Failure to Properly Explain Arbitration Agreement and Inform Residents of Rights

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to properly explain the Arbitration Agreement to two residents, both of whom had moderately impaired memory and cognition as documented in their Minimum Data Set assessments. One resident was asked to sign the agreement during a physical therapy session without any explanation or opportunity to read the document, and was not informed of the right to refuse or rescind the agreement. The resident later expressed concern about potentially giving up the right to present disputes in court and stated a desire to discuss the agreement with family before signing. Another resident was approached by two staff members and asked to sign the Arbitration Agreement without any explanation of its contents, being told only that it was "not something bad." The resident was unaware of the right to refuse to sign or to rescind the agreement, and the date on the form was entered by someone else without the resident's knowledge. Both residents' agreements were backdated by the Director of Admission due to missing electronic records, and the Director admitted to not providing a proper explanation or being aware of the residents' right to rescind. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of understanding regarding the Arbitration Agreement and the residents' rights associated with it. The facility's policy requires that the agreement be explained in a manner understandable to the resident or representative, explicitly inform them of their right not to sign, and grant the right to rescind within 30 days. These requirements were not met, resulting in a violation of the residents' rights to make informed decisions about their care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙