Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Ensure Advance Directive Documentation for Cognitively Impaired Resident

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident had an advance directive in place or that the resident’s wishes regarding advance directives were properly documented and communicated. The resident, who was admitted and later readmitted with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, and moderate intellectual disabilities, was found to have limited capacity to consent and was severely cognitively impaired. Documentation from the care conference indicated the resident did not have an advance directive and did not wish to formulate one, but there was no evidence that the responsible party or legal representative was involved in this decision-making process, despite the resident’s impaired capacity. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the Discharge Planner did not verify the existence of an advance directive upon admission or readmission, nor did she document follow-up with the Regional Center or notify the physician of the resident’s advance directive status. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility’s policy required inquiry about advance directives prior to or upon admission, but this was not followed. As a result, the resident was considered full code by default, and the facility did not have documentation to support the resident’s or representative’s wishes regarding end-of-life care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙