Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Ensure Consistent Monitoring of Elopement Device Function

Middleton, Wisconsin Survey Completed on 05-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents, specifically regarding the monitoring of an elopement device. The resident in question had multiple diagnoses, including cerebral infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, psychosis, mood disorder, substance abuse, anxiety disorder, personality disorder, and encephalopathy. Although there was a physician's order to check the placement and location of the wander device, there was no order or documentation in the treatment authorization request (TAR) to check the function of the device. The facility's Elopement/Unsafe Wandering Policy and Procedure did not address monitoring the function of the elopement device. Interviews with nursing staff and facility leadership revealed inconsistent knowledge and practices regarding how and how often to check the function of the wander device. Some staff were unaware of the correct procedure or equipment to use, while others provided varying answers about the frequency of checks, ranging from every shift to daily or only on the night shift. The Director of Nursing stated that all nurses should know how to check the function of the device and that it should be done every shift, but this was not reflected in staff responses or in facility policy. This lack of clear guidance and consistent practice led to the deficiency in ensuring the resident's safety from accident hazards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙