Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Ensure Physician Review and Response to Pharmacist Recommendations

Sissonville, West Virginia Survey Completed on 04-16-2025

Penalty

Fine: $54,438
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the attending physician reviewed and acted upon the recommendations made by the consulting pharmacist for multiple residents. In several instances, the pharmacist identified issues such as inappropriate medication diagnoses, the need for updated or clarified medication orders, and the necessity for specific monitoring related to psychoactive medications and anticoagulants. Despite these recommendations being documented in the residents' records, there was no evidence that the physician reviewed, acknowledged, or responded to them as required by facility policy and procedure. For example, one resident was prescribed Quetiapine for muscle weakness, which the pharmacist noted was not an appropriate diagnosis, and requested clarification and documentation of specific behaviors justifying the use of the antipsychotic. The pharmacist also recommended monitoring for side effects and specific behaviors for other medications, such as Buspar and Duloxetine, and requested that orders be updated to include monitoring for signs and symptoms of bleeding and thromboembolism for residents on anticoagulants like Rivaroxaban and Eliquis. In each case, the facility did not ensure that the physician reviewed or acted on these recommendations. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and a corporate RN, confirmed that the physician had not signed or responded to the pharmacist's recommendations, and in some cases, the facility could not locate the recommendations or any response from the physician or DON. This deficiency was identified for all five residents reviewed, indicating a systemic failure to follow established procedures for pharmacist recommendations and physician review.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙