Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0644
D

Failure to Incorporate PASARR Recommendations into Care Plan

Mount Vernon, Washington Survey Completed on 04-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation into the care plan for a resident with a history of bipolar disorder, anxiety, and PTSD. The resident was found to be cognitively intact and had qualified for a Level II PASARR due to serious mental health conditions. The Level II psychiatric evaluation included specific recommendations for environmental safety, staff approaches (such as assigning female staff for intimate care due to past trauma with males), and behavioral interventions involving close coordination with the social services department. Despite these recommendations, a review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence that the PASARR findings or suggested interventions were incorporated. Interviews with facility staff, including social services and clinical leadership, revealed a lack of awareness regarding the recommendations and an absence of updates to the care plan. The facility's policy required that PASARR recommendations be included in the person-centered care plan, but this was not followed for the resident in question.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙