Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
E

Failure to Log, Investigate, and Resolve Resident Grievances

Mount Vernon, Washington Survey Completed on 04-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to establish and maintain an effective grievance system to ensure that residents' verbal concerns were initiated, logged, addressed, and resolved in a timely manner. Review of resident council meeting minutes over several months revealed that multiple grievances, such as requests for fresh fruit, complaints about food temperature, and concerns about call light response times, were repeatedly raised by residents but not documented or followed up through the facility's grievance process. The facility's grievance log did not contain any entries corresponding to these concerns, despite their documentation in meeting minutes and repeated verbal reports by residents. Interviews with residents indicated that they were unsure of the grievance process, with some expressing fear of retaliation or uncertainty about how to file a grievance. Several residents reported missing personal items, unresolved maintenance issues, and dietary concerns, none of which were formally logged or investigated according to facility policy. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent understanding and application of the grievance process, with some staff unaware of the need to complete grievance forms or believing that informal resolution was sufficient. The facility's policy required all grievances to be documented, investigated, and resolved with written communication to the resident, but this was not consistently followed. Specific examples included residents reporting missing belongings, unresolved maintenance requests such as a non-functioning television, and dietary issues like inappropriate snacks for a pureed diet. Staff responses varied, with some attempting informal resolution and others unaware of the concerns until prompted by surveyors. The lack of a systematic approach to logging and addressing grievances prevented the facility from identifying care trends and evaluating the effectiveness of any actions taken, resulting in residents repeatedly voicing the same issues without resolution.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙