Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
G

Failure to Monitor and Address Significant Weight Loss in Resident at Nutritional Risk

Moses Lake, Washington Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident at risk for weight loss received appropriate nutritional review and intervention. The resident, who had a history of skin breakdown, protein-calorie malnutrition, post-surgical recovery from a fractured thigh, rheumatoid arthritis, and urinary tract infections, experienced a significant unplanned weight loss of 18.67% over 40 days. Despite facility policies requiring regular nutritional assessments and weight monitoring, there was only one documented nutrition assessment shortly after admission, with no follow-up assessments or progress notes for nearly two months. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident consistently consumed less than the targeted amount of food, with meal intake ranging from 25% to 75%. Staff did not routinely offer alternative food options when the resident refused meals, and there was a lack of documentation regarding reasons for meal refusals or what alternatives were provided. The resident's care plan identified them as being at nutritional risk, but interventions were not effectively implemented or monitored, and significant weight changes were not communicated to the interdisciplinary team, physician, or dietitian as required by facility policy. Further, key staff members, including the ARNP, case manager, and registered dietitian, were unaware of the resident's significant weight loss and nutritional decline. The dietitian noted discrepancies in weight documentation and gaps in communication about the resident's condition. The resident was eventually hospitalized with low protein levels, electrolyte imbalance, and aspiration pneumonia, highlighting the lack of coordinated care and timely response to the resident's nutritional needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙