Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Refer Resident with Indwelling Catheter for Urologist Assessment

Moses Lake, Washington Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident was admitted to the facility with a urinary retention catheter following a hospital stay, during which the catheter was placed and the resident developed a urinary tract infection (UTI). The resident had a history of heart disease and was alert and oriented at the time of admission. The medical record indicated that the resident was not on a urinary catheter prior to admission and had experienced multiple UTIs and antibiotic treatments since being at the facility. Observations and interviews confirmed the ongoing use of the urinary catheter and repeated episodes of UTIs. Despite the resident's repeated UTIs and continued use of the urinary catheter, there was no evidence that the facility referred the resident to a urologist to assess the necessity of the catheter or to determine the cause of the recurrent infections. The Resident Care Manager confirmed that no referral had been made to obtain further evaluation or orders regarding the catheter's continued use or possible removal. This lack of referral and assessment contributed to the deficiency cited in the report.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙