Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0645
E

Failure to Accurately Review and Validate PASARR Documentation on Admission

Moses Lake, Washington Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately review and validate Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) for three out of five residents reviewed. Specifically, residents were admitted with diagnoses such as dementia, depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and were receiving psychotropic medications. However, their PASARR documentation did not consistently reflect these diagnoses or the need for a Level II evaluation, as required. For example, one resident's PASARR indicated no serious mental illness (SMI) despite documented depression and anxiety, while another's PASARR failed to list depression or OCD, even though both were present upon admission. Interviews with staff revealed that the admissions process involved reviewing PASARRs prior to admission, but there was no consistent verification of PASARR information against residents' actual diagnoses. Staff reported challenges in obtaining corrected PASARRs from hospitals and were not always aware when PASARRs were inaccurate. Additionally, there was confusion among staff regarding responsibility for verifying PASARR accuracy and awareness of updated PASARR processes, despite recent training. These lapses resulted in residents being admitted with incomplete or incorrect PASARR documentation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙