Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Ensure Valid Medical Justification and Assessment for Indwelling Catheter Use

Auburn, Washington Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to ensure that an indwelling urinary catheter for one resident had a valid medical justification or a plan for discontinuation, as required by facility policy. The resident, who was admitted with a diagnosis of renal insufficiency but without obstructive uropathy or neurogenic bladder, had a catheter placed during a prior hospitalization. Upon admission, the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the presence of the catheter, and a later MDS showed a new diagnosis of obstructive uropathy. However, there was no documentation supporting a history of untreatable urinary blockage or inability to void prior to hospitalization. Staff initiated a voiding trial and discontinued the catheter per provider order, but failed to document the number of times the resident urinated, the volume of urine output, or any post-void residuals. The catheter was reinserted after staff noted urinary retention, but there was no evidence that a urology consult was considered to confirm the need for continued catheter use. Additionally, there was no documentation of interventions to address the potential decline in bladder function due to prolonged catheter use. Staff interviews confirmed that required assessments and policy protocols were not followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙