Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Provide Timely and Appropriate Foot Care and Podiatry Services

Auburn, Washington Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide necessary foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards for three residents with diabetes and other complex medical conditions. One resident, who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for lower extremity care, had not received podiatry services since admission, despite having a history of ingrown toenails and visible debris on the toenail bed. Staff interviews confirmed that diabetic residents should be referred to podiatry upon admission and seen quarterly, but this did not occur. Another resident, also cognitively intact with diabetes, had a significant gap in podiatry follow-up after an initial consult, with staff acknowledging that recommended follow-up visits were missed due to issues with the previous podiatrist and delays in arranging new services. A third resident with heart failure, end-stage kidney failure, diabetes, and a diabetic foot ulcer had multiple recommendations from a consulting wound provider and a physician's order for a podiatry referral, but there was no documentation that the referral was completed or that the resident was seen by a podiatrist. Staff confirmed that the resident had not received podiatry services as recommended, citing ongoing issues with arranging podiatry care. These findings were based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, and demonstrate a failure to ensure timely and appropriate foot care for residents at risk.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙