Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
E

Failure to Properly Inform Residents and Representatives of Binding Arbitration Agreements

Port Angeles, Washington Survey Completed on 05-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that binding arbitration agreements were properly reviewed and explained to residents or their representatives, resulting in a lack of understanding about the agreements' terms and implications. For three residents, either the resident or their representative signed the arbitration agreement without being explicitly informed that they were waiving their right to litigation in a court proceeding. Interviews revealed that these individuals did not recall being told about their right to refuse or withdraw from the agreement, nor did they understand the arbitration process or the legal consequences of signing. One resident, who had recently been hospitalized for sepsis and was recovering from a urinary tract infection with a history of hallucinations, expressed uncertainty about their mental acuity at the time of signing. Another resident's POA and a responsible party for a third resident both stated they did not understand what they had signed, with one indicating they were in a distressed state due to a family member's critical illness. Staff interviews indicated that the business office manager provided explanations that were inconsistent with the actual terms of the arbitration agreement, suggesting that residents could still go to court after arbitration, which was inaccurate. The administrator acknowledged that the expectation was for staff to explain the agreements in an understandable way, but admitted that this was not achieved, as evidenced by the residents' and representatives' lack of understanding. There was no documentation or evidence that the agreements were explained in a manner accommodating the needs of the residents or their representatives, nor that their consent was fully informed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙