Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Assess and Document Use of Physical Restraint-Related Devices

Port Angeles, Washington Survey Completed on 05-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to comprehensively assess and document the use of physical restraint-related devices for four residents, including bed rails/mobility bars, beds placed against the wall, and a wander guard. For one resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of psychosis, a wander guard was ordered and used daily, but there was no documented safety evaluation or care plan addressing its use. Staff interviews confirmed that required assessments and documentation were missing. Another resident, who was cognitively intact, had a physician's order for their bed to be placed against the wall as a safety device. However, there was no evidence of a Physical Therapy evaluation or documentation of less restrictive alternatives being attempted prior to this intervention. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that such documentation and evaluation should have been completed before implementing the intervention. For a resident with severe cognitive impairment, mobility bars were ordered for safe mobility, but both bars were found to be loose and unstable during inspection. Staff confirmed that the bars should have been solid and stationary, and recognized the risk of injury or entrapment. There was no documentation of a comprehensive assessment for the use of these mobility bars, nor evidence that less restrictive alternatives were considered. Similarly, another resident with severe cognitive impairment had their bed placed against the wall without an order, assessment, or care plan, and no documentation of less restrictive alternatives. Staff interviews revealed confusion about responsibility for assessments and a lack of required documentation in the electronic health record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙