Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0553
E

Failure to Involve Residents and Representatives in Person-Centered Care Planning

Port Angeles, Washington Survey Completed on 05-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were included in the development and implementation of their person-centered plans of care, as evidenced by multiple instances where residents or their representatives were not involved in care conferences or discussions regarding significant care decisions. For several residents who were cognitively intact or had decision-making capacity, there was no documentation that they were consulted or gave consent for hospital transfers, changes in code status, or the initiation of end-of-life (EOL) or comfort care services. In one case, a resident with a POLST indicating comfort-focused treatment was sent to the hospital multiple times without documented consent or re-evaluation of their preferences, and the resident later expressed a desire for more active treatment if it would save their life. Other residents with significant changes in condition, such as weight loss or the initiation of palliative care, were not included in discussions about their care plans. For example, a resident with depression and malnutrition was not informed about the discontinuation of weights or involved in decisions regarding EOL care and anti-anxiety medication, despite expressing a desire to be weighed and to have their preferences considered. Documentation was lacking to show that residents or their legal representatives were notified or involved in these decisions, and staff interviews confirmed that such conversations either did not occur or were not documented as required. Additionally, residents with severe cognitive impairment and their legal representatives were not included in care planning or notified about significant changes such as the initiation of comfort care or discontinuation of weights. In several cases, representatives reported not being aware of the resident's care status or the meaning of comfort care, and there was no evidence of care conferences or individualized care planning. The lack of resident and representative involvement was further confirmed by staff who acknowledged the absence of required documentation and individualized care plans.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙