Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Provide Timely Foot Care for Residents

Windsor, Virginia Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to provide appropriate foot care for two residents who required assistance with activities of daily living. Both residents had long, thick, and discolored toenails, with one resident reporting that her toenails were getting caught in bedcovers and causing pain. Observations revealed that neither resident had received recent podiatry care, and there was no documentation in their clinical records indicating that foot or podiatry care had been provided. One resident did not recall seeing a podiatrist, while the other stated it had been a long time since her last visit. During interviews, staff acknowledged the lack of recent podiatry care and indicated that the residents would be added to the schedule for the next podiatry visit. The facility did not have an independent foot care policy, and the only documentation available was a health care agreement for podiatry services. The deficiency was identified through direct observation, record review, and staff interviews, which confirmed that necessary foot care had not been provided to the affected residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙