Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0801
F

Lack of Qualified Dietitian and Food Service Deficiencies

Arlington, Virginia Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

Fine: $27,165
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional, either full-time, part-time, or on a consultant basis, for a period of approximately three weeks. Observations and interviews confirmed that there was no qualified nutrition professional present during food preparation, and staff, including the head of the department and the corporate registered dietitian, acknowledged the absence. The registered dietitian from a sister facility only visited a couple of times per week to assist, but this did not fulfill the requirement for a qualified nutrition professional to oversee the food and nutrition service. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that food was served at palatable temperatures, as residents attending council meetings reported that their food was cold. The facility also failed to consistently offer drinks, including water and other liquids, to residents in accordance with their needs and preferences to maintain hydration. Furthermore, bread products stored in the kitchen were not properly dated, labeled, or covered, creating a potential environment for food-borne illnesses.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙