Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
E

Failure to Document Weekly Skin Assessments for At-Risk Residents

Granbury, Texas Survey Completed on 05-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for three residents by not documenting weekly skin assessments as required. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment and significant physical assistance needs, there was no evidence of weekly skin inspections for multiple weeks, despite the resident being at risk for pressure ulcers and having no current skin issues. Another resident, who was cognitively intact but required substantial assistance and had stage 4 pressure ulcers, also lacked documentation of weekly skin assessments for several weeks, even though wound care orders and a care plan were in place for her pressure ulcers. A third resident, also with severe cognitive impairment and high risk for pressure ulcers, did not have weekly skin assessments documented for an extended period, despite her care plan indicating the need for extensive assistance and monitoring for potential pressure ulcer development. Observations and interviews confirmed that staff performed skin checks during care activities, and CNAs completed shower sheets, but these assessments were not consistently documented in the electronic medical record as required by facility policy. Interviews with nursing staff, the ADON, DON, and the administrator revealed that charge nurses were responsible for completing and documenting weekly skin assessments in the electronic system. However, changes in the electronic medical record system and competing duties contributed to missed documentation. The DON and ADON acknowledged the failure to document, attributing it to system updates and workflow challenges, but maintained that skin assessments were being performed even if not recorded.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙