Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Document Pacemaker Information in Resident Record

Boerne, Texas Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a cardiac pacemaker had the device's make, model, and related information documented in the medical record. Record reviews showed that the resident's admission record did not include a diagnosis description for a cardiac pacemaker, and the care plan lacked the required pacemaker information. The resident's MDS assessment indicated the presence of a pacemaker and moderate cognitive impairment, and the care plan referenced the need for monitoring and documentation of pacemaker-related symptoms, but the specific device details were missing. Additionally, there were no physician orders related to the pacemaker in the resident's consolidated orders. Interviews with staff confirmed awareness of the resident's pacemaker, but the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the make and model were only available in an email and had not been entered into the resident's record. The corporate administrator stated there was no pacemaker policy, and the care plan preparer indicated that the make and model were added to the care plan only after the surveyor's inquiry. The DON also confirmed the absence of a physician's order for the pacemaker and stated that such devices should have an order for proper monitoring.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙