Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Provide Adequate Foot Care Due to Unaddressed Care Refusal

Brownsville, Texas Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate foot care for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including dementia, diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. The resident's toenails were observed to be long, thick, discolored, and curving toward another toe, with staff and podiatrist documentation confirming the inability to trim the nails due to the resident's combative and resistive behaviors. Despite care plan interventions to refer to a podiatrist and monitor foot care needs, there were no documented further attempts to address the toenail issue after an initial refusal, and the resident's condition persisted over several months. Staff interviews revealed that the resident was known to be combative and would not allow staff to provide personal care, including nail trimming, often requiring multiple staff members for basic hygiene tasks. The CNA and LVN both acknowledged the resident's refusal and the risk posed by the untrimmed nails, but also indicated that alternative approaches or interventions, such as medication to facilitate care, had not been attempted. The podiatrist confirmed multiple unsuccessful attempts to provide care, and the responsible family member was aware of the ongoing issue and the need for podiatric intervention. Facility leadership, including the DON and Administrator, were aware of the resident's right to refuse care but had not implemented additional strategies to address the ongoing refusal or to mitigate the risk associated with the resident's foot condition. The facility's policy required staff to attempt to identify underlying causes of care refusal and to try different approaches, but there was no evidence that such measures were consistently or effectively implemented in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙