Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Assess and Document Use of Physical Restraint Device

Savannah, Tennessee Survey Completed on 04-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to complete required assessments before or during the use of a specialized chest harness, which functioned as a physical restraint for a resident with significant mobility and neurological impairments. Facility policy stated that physical restraints would only be used as a last resort, with physician orders, consent, and after less restrictive measures had been tried and failed. The policy also required qualified staff to evaluate residents for device needs and to regularly check devices for safety and skin integrity. However, there was no evidence of an assessment, consent, or regular monitoring related to the harness used for this resident. The resident in question had a complex medical history, including Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy, Epilepsy, Conversion Disorder with Seizures, Scoliosis, Postural Kyphosis, and reduced mobility. The resident's care plan acknowledged the use of a safety harness in the wheelchair and directed staff to assess circulation every shift, but there was no documentation of these checks on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) or Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the relevant periods. The resident was observed to be dependent for dressing and had poor memory, and the harness was justified in a seating and mobility evaluation as necessary for safety due to involuntary muscle spasms and decreased postural control. During interviews, staff members, including the MDS Coordinator and DON, were unable to provide documentation of assessments, skin checks, or signed consent for the harness. The harness was not listed on the TAR or MAR, and staff were unclear about whether it constituted a restraint or if appropriate monitoring was being conducted. The lack of assessment, documentation, and consent for the use of the harness constituted a failure to comply with facility policy and regulatory requirements regarding physical restraints.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙