Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Accurately Assess and Document Fall and Elopement Risks

Custer, South Dakota Survey Completed on 04-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately assess and document the safety risks of two residents, resulting in deficiencies related to fall and elopement prevention. For one resident with a history of falls, the Fall Risk Evaluation completed on 9/19/24 was incorrectly scored, omitting points for medications that increase fall risk, despite the resident receiving hypoglycemic, diuretic, and psychotropic medications daily. This led to an underestimation of the resident's fall risk. Additionally, no subsequent quarterly Fall Risk Evaluations were completed after 9/19/24, nor was an evaluation performed after the resident experienced a fall on 2/10/25 that required medical care outside the facility. The administrator confirmed these assessments were not completed as required and that there was no facility policy for Fall Risk Assessment. For another resident with a history of elopement, the initial Elopement Risk Evaluation and the post-elopement evaluation both failed to identify the resident as at risk, even after an actual elopement event. The evaluation incorrectly marked that the resident had no history of elopement, despite the incident. The administrator acknowledged the error in scoring and confirmed that the evaluations did not accurately reflect the resident's risk status. The facility's policy required a systematic approach to monitoring and managing residents at risk for elopement, including proper identification and assessment, which was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙