Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0637
D

Failure to Complete Significant Change MDS After Hospice Revocation

Mount Pleasant, South Carolina Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

Fine: $7,599
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident who revoked hospice services following an improvement in condition. According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) is required when a resident discontinues hospice care. Documentation showed that the resident, who had a history of anoxic brain damage and was initially admitted to hospice, later stabilized and gained weight, leading to the revocation of hospice services. Despite this change, only a quarterly MDS assessment was completed, not the required significant change assessment. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness regarding the requirement to complete a significant change assessment when a resident revokes hospice services. The MDS Director confirmed that the resident discontinued hospice but stated they were unaware of the need for a significant change assessment. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that the assessment had not been completed. This oversight was identified through record review, staff interviews, and review of the resident's electronic medical record.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙