Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
D

Failure to Protect Cognitively Impaired Resident from Sexual Abuse

East Providence, Rhode Island Survey Completed on 04-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to protect a resident with severe cognitive impairment from sexual abuse by another resident. On 4/19/2025, a Licensed Practical Nurse observed a resident with moderately impaired cognition inappropriately touching and kissing a resident who was not alert and aware, as evidenced by a BIMS score of 5 out of 15 and a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The incident was reported to the Rhode Island Department of Health, and documentation confirmed that the resident who was touched could not consent to intimate contact due to cognitive impairment. The facility's own policy defines sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual contact, including unwanted intimate touching, especially when the resident lacks the capacity to consent. Interviews with staff, the resident's family, and facility leadership confirmed that the resident was unable to consent and that the family did not approve of any intimate relationship. The resident who committed the act was sent for psychiatric evaluation, and the facility moved this resident to a different unit. However, the facility was unable to provide evidence that adequate measures were in place to prevent the incident or to keep the cognitively impaired resident free from abuse, resulting in a failure to protect the resident as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙