Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for PASRR, Tobacco Use, and Anticoagulant Documentation

Harmony, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

Fine: $42,530
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the status of four residents, as required by facility policy and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual. For two residents with documented diagnoses of serious mental illness and positive Level II PASRR screenings, the MDS assessments incorrectly indicated that they were not considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness or related condition. This was confirmed by both clinical documentation and staff interviews, which established that the residents did meet the criteria for serious mental illness according to state review. Additionally, one resident's MDS assessment failed to accurately reflect current tobacco use. Despite clinical records, physician orders, and a smoking safety screening indicating that the resident smoked 5-10 cigarettes daily and was permitted to smoke under supervision, the MDS was coded as 'No' for current tobacco use. Nursing progress notes further documented the resident's participation in smoking activities and related behavioral incidents during smoking times. For two other residents, the MDS assessments indicated that they had received anticoagulant medications during the 7-day look-back period. However, a review of their clinical records did not reveal any physician orders for anticoagulant medications, suggesting that the MDS entries were inaccurate. These discrepancies were acknowledged by the facility's LPN Assessment Coordinator during staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙