Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Respond Timely to Resident Call Bells

Kingston, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 06-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes each resident's quality of life by not responding timely to residents' requests for assistance. Multiple residents reported excessive wait times after activating their call bell lights, with some waiting over an hour for staff to respond. During a resident council meeting, several residents described frequent delays, particularly during the evening shift, and instances where staff entered rooms, turned off call bell lights, and left without providing care. One resident recounted waiting two hours for incontinence care after the call bell was silenced, while another stated she typically waited at least 30 minutes for assistance. These delays were corroborated by interviews and observations, including a resident with vision impairment who was unable to access his call bell, which was found on the floor and out of reach during the surveyor's visit. Clinical record reviews revealed that the affected residents were cognitively intact and had various medical conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, and a below-the-knee amputation. Despite their ability to communicate their needs, these residents consistently experienced long wait times for care, both during the day and night shifts. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that residents should receive timely care but was unable to explain the consistent delays reported by multiple residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙