Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop Resident-Centered Care Plans for Incontinence, Hospice Activities, and Smoking

Ashland, Oregon Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement individualized, resident-centered care plans for three residents with specific needs related to incontinence, hospice activities, and independent smoking. For one resident with arthritis and a history of depression and anxiety, the care plan did not include detailed instructions regarding the resident's preferred times for incontinence care, despite staff and resident reports that the resident was particular about care routines and often refused care from unfamiliar staff. The care plan also did not reflect the resident's current status, as the most recent assessments indicated the resident was cognitively intact and did not refuse care, yet staff interactions revealed ongoing issues with care refusals and unmet incontinence needs. Another resident admitted on hospice with cancer had an activity assessment identifying several meaningful activities, such as reading, listening to music, and being outdoors. However, the care plan failed to specify which activities were important to the resident, and staff were unaware that the care plan did not automatically include these preferences. As a result, CNAs did not have access to information about the resident's preferred activities, limiting their ability to provide individualized, meaningful engagement as identified in the assessment. A third resident, approved for independent smoking, did not have a care plan addressing the management and storage of smoking materials. Staff were unclear about whether the resident was allowed to possess smoking materials or where these items were kept, and the facility had not provided a lock box to secure them. The facility's smoking policy did not address individualized care planning for independent smokers, and staff acknowledged that the lack of a care plan prevented them from ensuring the safety of the resident and others regarding access to lighters and smoking materials.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙