Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate Coding of Resident Assessments

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 04-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that resident assessments were accurately coded to reflect the current status of three residents. For one resident with dementia, heart failure, and COPD, a new open wound was documented in a progress note, but the corresponding quarterly MDS assessment did not indicate the presence of any wounds. Staff interviews confirmed that the wound should have been captured in the assessment. Another resident with severe intellectual disabilities and a history of metabolic acidemia had their feeding tube removed and was not on tube feeding as of a specific date, yet the quarterly assessment inaccurately documented the presence of a PEG tube. Staff confirmed the resident was no longer on tube feeding at the time of the assessment. A third resident with dementia and mobility issues experienced two documented falls within a month, as shown in incident reports. However, the quarterly assessment for this resident indicated no falls had occurred since admission or the previous assessment. Staff interviews acknowledged that the assessment should have included both falls. These discrepancies between clinical documentation and MDS assessments demonstrate a failure to ensure accurate resident assessments.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙