Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate Coding of MDS Assessments for Two Residents

Clinton, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 06-05-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data for two of twelve sampled residents. For one resident, the annual assessment dated 03/23/25 had both the functional assessment and pain section marked as not assessed, despite the resident being on routine pain management. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the assessment was incomplete and not accurate, noting that the corporate nurse had completed the assessment but could have delegated the unassessed areas to a facility nurse. For another resident, the quarterly MDS assessment dated 03/18/25 did not indicate that the resident was on hospice services, even though a physician order dated 06/30/24 documented the resident's admission to hospice. The DON confirmed that the resident had been on hospice since 06/30/24 and that the MDS assessment should have reflected this status.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙