Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
J

Failure to Supervise and Implement Interventions for Resident with Exit-Seeking Behaviors

Clinton, Oklahoma Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

Fine: $22,320
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement appropriate interventions for a resident with known exit-seeking and wandering behaviors. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, impulse disorder, schizophrenia, and gait abnormalities, was repeatedly assessed as high risk for wandering, with multiple documented high scores on the facility's wandering risk scale. Despite these assessments and documented incidents of wandering and exit-seeking, the resident's care plan was not updated to address these risks until after a significant elopement event. The resident was able to leave the facility on two separate occasions. On the first occasion, dietary staff observed the resident exiting through the front door and found them in the parking lot. The care plan was not updated following this incident, and no new interventions were implemented to address the ongoing risk. On the second occasion, the resident eloped and was found approximately half a mile away from the facility on a busy four-lane road. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent awareness of the resident's elopement risk, with some staff unaware of the risk until after the elopement occurred, and others stating they had not received training on wandering until after the incident. Observations and interviews indicated that exit doors were equipped with alarms and egress releases, but there were reports of alarms malfunctioning or not being heard at the time of the elopement. Staff were unclear on how the resident exited the building, and documentation showed that the care plan lacked specific interventions for wandering and elopement until after the second elopement event. The facility's failure to update the care plan and provide adequate supervision and interventions for a resident at high risk for elopement led to the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙