Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement and Educate Staff on Reverse Isolation Precautions

Lakeside, Ohio Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure there was a policy and procedure in place for reverse isolation, and staff were not knowledgeable about the requirements for reverse isolation as ordered by the physician for a resident who was immunocompromised. The resident, who had diagnoses including pancytopenia and immunodeficiency due to drugs, was admitted with a physician's order for reverse isolation following critically low white blood cell and platelet counts. Despite the order, staff actions were inconsistent: some staff entered the resident's room without donning personal protective equipment (PPE), and there was confusion among staff and leadership regarding what reverse isolation entailed. Observations confirmed that signage and PPE were inconsistently used, and staff interviews revealed varying interpretations of the reverse isolation order, with some staff believing PPE was no longer required and others unsure of the specific precautions needed. Further interviews with the DON, who also served as the facility's Infection Preventionist, and the Administrator confirmed that the facility did not have a policy covering reverse isolation and had not clarified the physician's order. The physician indicated that the use of PPE would depend on the facility's policy, but no such policy existed. This lack of clear policy and staff education resulted in inconsistent implementation of reverse isolation precautions for the immunocompromised resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙