Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Accurately Assess and Treat Pressure Ulcer

Lima, Ohio Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately assess and document a resident's pressure wound and did not complete wound treatments as ordered. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic ulcer, and osteomyelitis, required extensive assistance with mobility and had a history of a wound on the right heel. Despite ongoing wound care needs, the care plan did not include a current plan for pressure wound management. Facility wound assessments repeatedly described the wound as 'other' rather than identifying it as a pressure ulcer, and lacked detailed descriptions. The wound care center later identified the wound as a stage three pressure ulcer, but this information was not initially obtained or incorporated by the facility. Additionally, wound treatments were not performed according to physician orders. During an observation, a dressing on the resident's right heel was found to be several days old, despite orders for dressing changes three times weekly. The dressing showed yellow/green drainage, and staff confirmed the treatment had not been completed as scheduled. Facility policy required wound treatments to be completed per physician orders and for pressure ulcers to be differentiated from non-pressure ulcers, but these protocols were not followed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙